How authors really frame a top manuscript

Even if the research is successful, the writers' work is not over. They must write the finest paper possible for submission to a specific journal, which will present the study in the correct context and increase the chances of approval.

This is the process of framing the manuscript, and for this editorial, we asked experienced academic colleagues for their ideas and opinions on how writers should best frame papers for journal submission.

On this topic, each writer was invited to offer three to five bits of advise to new researchers. Our goal is to make some non-obvious suggestions to young researchers that would significantly improve the article in the eyes of the reviewers.

From the introduction to the conclusion, our experts offer advice on how to frame each component of a typical academic essay, as well as some ideas for general improvement.

Finally, we provide some concluding thoughts about the significance of devoting time and effort to properly framing the work.

Contributors could, for example, make a few suggestions for how an author could nail the literature review, write a convincing methodology section, present coherent findings, express a clear theoretical or conceptual contribution, or write managerial implications or future research avenues that don't sound like a rushed afterthought. We asked writers to provide a brief tale or two to explain their ideas, even if a few lines for each piece of advise would do.

The remainder of this commentary is divided into the following sections. We begin by presenting the perspectives of our authors on the various portions of a typical research publication, from the introduction to the conclusion and management implications. Following that, we make some general observations on manuscript length.

ads